Unofficial guide. Not affiliated with Meta.

Last updated:

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5

Three fast, cheap models people compare for agents and high-volume API work. They are priced very differently and their vendors publish different benchmarks, so this page lines up what can actually be compared.

Short version: For short prompts Haiku 5.5 has the lowest list price; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash wins on long prompts, cache hits and off-peak batch work, and is the only one with open weights. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs the most per token but adds audio and video input and a free tier. On Artificial Analysis’s index they sit close together: Haiku 5.5 43, Gemini 3.8 Flash 41, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 39 (September release).

Specs and prices side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 3.8 FlashClaude Haiku 5.5
Input / output per 1M$0.15 / $0.60 off-peak, $0.30 / $1.20 peak$0.75 / $3.75 (launch price to Dec 31, 2026; $1.50 / $7.50 after)$0.10 / $0.50 up to 100K; $0.50 / $2.50 above
Cached input per 1M$0.003 / $0.006$0.075$0.01 ($0.05 above 100K)
Context / max output1M / 384K1,048,576 / 65,5361M / 128K
InputsText, imagesText, images, video, audioText, images
Open weightsYes (MIT)NoNo
ReleasedSept 10, 2026 (1017 update Oct 17)Sept 2, 2026Oct 7, 2026

Source: DeepSeek Models & Pricing

Source: Gemini API pricing

Source: Gemini 3.8 Flash model page

Source: Anthropic pricing doc

What the same workload costs

A: 1,000 calls of 20K input tokens (half cached) and 2K output. B: 100 long-context calls of 200K input tokens (90% cached) and 4K output. List prices, cache-write and storage fees ignored.

ModelWorkload AWorkload B
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, off-peak$2.73$0.59
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, peak$5.46$1.19
Claude Haiku 5.5$2.10$2.90
Gemini 3.8 Flash (launch price)$15.75$4.35

Each model counts tokens with its own tokenizer and thinks for a different number of tokens, so the real bill per task can differ from these list-price examples.

Source: DeepSeek Models & Pricing

Source: Anthropic pricing doc

Source: Gemini API pricing

Benchmarks: what can be compared

The vendors mostly publish different tests. These rows are the overlap; vendor numbers come from each company’s own runs, so small gaps mean little.

TestDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 3.8 FlashClaude Haiku 5.5
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index394143
AA output speed (tokens/s)175.9131.5235.8
AA cost per index task$0.27 (peak price)$1.24$0.21
Terminal-Bench 4.0 (vendor)42.3 (1017)Not published39.2 (max effort)
Humanity's Last Exam, no tools (vendor)36.8Not published45.9
Humanity's Last Exam, with tools (vendor)63.9Not published57.4

Artificial Analysis figures read on 2026-10-13 (Gemini, Haiku) and 2026-10-17 (DeepSeek, September release at Max effort).

Source: Artificial Analysis: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Source: Artificial Analysis: Gemini 3.8 Flash

Source: Artificial Analysis: Claude Haiku 5.5

Source: DeepSeek API change log

Source: Hugging Face model card

Source: Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5

Which one to pick

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash guide · Gemini 3.8 Flash guide · Claude Haiku 5.5 guide

FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5?

Not for short prompts: Haiku 5.5 lists $0.10 / $0.50 against DeepSeek’s $0.15 / $0.60 off-peak. Above 100K-token prompts Haiku rises to $0.50 / $2.50, and DeepSeek’s cache hits are cheaper, so long-context work usually costs less on DeepSeek.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheaper than Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Yes, at list price. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75 / $3.75 per 1M tokens at its launch price, five times DeepSeek’s off-peak input price and over six times its output price.

Which is smartest?

They are close. Artificial Analysis scores Haiku 5.5 at 43, Gemini 3.8 Flash at 41 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at 39; DeepSeek’s 1017 update came after that test.

Which one has open weights?

Only DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, under the MIT licence.

Independent guide, not affiliated with DeepSeek, Google or Anthropic. Prices and model versions change often; check the linked official pages before you build on them.